Revitalizing Hands: A Comprehensive Review of Anatomy and Treatment Options for Hand Rejuvenation.

Dorsal hand rejuvenation is gaining popularity as a solitary procedure and adjunct to face and neck rejuvenation treatments. As the hands age, the skin loses elasticity and becomes more translucent, the veins, joints, and tendons appear more prominent, and the bones become more noticeable. These changes are due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Current treatment methods include the injection of dermal fillers and autologous fat grafting. Anatomic studies to ensure the successful implementation of rejuvenation procedures identified three separate fascial layers in the dorsum, from superficial to deep. More recent re-evaluations revealed a less distinct, inseparable, sponge-like fascial layer. All authors agree that the superficial dermal layer is probably the optimal location for the injection of volumizing materials because it is free of anatomical structures. Many methods for harvesting, preparing, and injecting fat grafts to the dorsum of the hand have been described in the past three decades. Both filler and fat-graft procedures are performed on an ambulatory basis under local anesthesia. Good results with low postoperative and long-term complication rates and high patient satisfaction have been reported.

Risk factors associated with accidental fetal skin lacerations during cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with accidental fetal skin lacerations (AFL) during cesarean section (CS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was obtained from the registry of two large medical centers between 2014 and 2019. The study group comprised all newborns identified with AFL. The rates of various potential risk factors were compared between the study group and a group of CS at which no AFL had occurred (the control group). RESULTS: Of the 14 666 CS deliveries, 48 cases of AFL (0.33%) were documented, 52% of these following urgent CS. Compared with the control group (n = 14 618), the only risk factors associated with AFL were premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (odds ratio [OR] 5.38, 95% convidence interval [CI] 2.97-9.74) and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (OR 6.50, 95% CI 2.55-16.54). In subgroup analysis by CS urgency, no significance for these factors was noted in elective CS group; but higher rates of both PROM and meconium-stained amniotic fluid were noted in the AFL during urgent CS (OR 14.23, 95% CI 6.30-32.16 and OR 15.36, (95% CI 5.65-41.75, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: During urgent CS, the surgeon should bear in mind that the presence of PROM or meconium-stained amniotic fluid should prompt extra care and application of preventive measures to decrease the rates of AFL.

Israeli Innovations in the Field of Plastic Surgery.

Numerous innovations within the field of plastic surgery have been developed in Israel over the last few decades. Many of these therapeutic devices and techniques have been established globally with demonstrable efficacy and respectable safety profiles. This article offers an overview of recent Israeli cutting-edge medical therapeutic solutions contributing to the global practice of plastic surgery.

Research Productivity among Plastic Surgeons in the State of Israel: h-index and M-quotient Assessment.

The h-index has been proven in the US and Canada to be a solid tool to assess the quality and impact of individual scientific work in the field of plastic surgery. M-quotient is an additional metric that mitigates the h-index's inherent bias toward more seasoned researchers. The objective of this study was evaluating the relationship between h-index and M-quotient and research productivity among plastic surgeons in the state of Israel. METHODS: A list of all Israeli board-certified plastic surgeons registered in the Israeli Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery was obtained from the organization's website. Relevant demographic and academic factors of each surgeon were retrieved. The Scopus database was queried to determine each surgeon's h-index and M-quotient, among other bibliometric parameters. RESULTS: Our study included 173 plastic surgeons, 90% of whom were men. In total, 49.7% were working in academically affiliated hospitals; 14.4% of the surgeons had an academic rank. The mean h-index was 6.13; mean M-quotient was 0.27. Statistical analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between total number of publications (P < 0.0001), total number of citations (P < 0.0001), the surgeon's seniority (P < 0.0001), academic rank (P = 0.007), appointed as past/present plastic surgery department director (P < 0.0001), and working in an academic affiliated hospital (P < 0.025). The same parameters were found to have a positive correlation with M-quotient. CONCLUSIONS: The h-index is an effective measure to compare plastic surgeons' research productivity in Israel. M-quotient is an ancillary tool for the assessment of research productivity among plastic surgeons, with the advent of neutralizing the surgeon's seniority.

Quality of Patient-Reported Outcome Studies Utilizing the BREAST-Q: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) studies are essential in the assessment of surgical procedures in plastic surgery. One accepted and validated questionnaire is the BREAST-Q. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the quality of PRO studies in plastic surgery utilizing the BREAST-Q questionnaire. METHODS: This study involved 2 steps: (1) a systematic review of 23 key criteria assessing the quality of survey research in studies utilizing the BREAST-Q that were published between 2015 and 2018; (2) a review of current guidance for survey research in journals related to plastic surgery and breast surgery which were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: Seventy-nine studies were included in the systematic review. Many key criteria were poorly reported: 51.9% of the studies did not provide a defined response rate and almost 90% did not provide a method for analysis of nonresponse error; 67.1% lacked a description of the sample's representativeness of the population of interest, and 82.3% did not present a sample size calculation. The methods used to analyze data were not described in 11.4% of the papers; in 27.8% the data analysis presented could not allow replication of the results. Of the 16 journals in the fields of plastic surgery and breast surgery for which the "instructions to authors" were reviewed, 15 (93.7%) did not provide any guidance for survey reporting. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of key criteria are underreported by authors publishing their survey research in peer-reviewed journals in the fields of plastic and breast surgery. There is an urgent need to construct well-developed reporting guidelines for survey research in plastic surgery, and particularly in breast surgery.